Fridge v. Buhler

6 La. Ann. 272
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1851
StatusPublished

This text of 6 La. Ann. 272 (Fridge v. Buhler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fridge v. Buhler, 6 La. Ann. 272 (La. 1851).

Opinion

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Slidell, J.

From the evidence before us, it does not appear that Roach had a legal defence against the note which he gave the executors for the price of property of the deceased purchased by him, and which they failed to collect. As the compromise made by one of the executors was without judicial sanction, and as they have not excused themselves by showing the insolvency of Roach or an absence of legal liability on his part, they were properly held liable for its amount.

A plea of prescription was filed in this court. In declining to sustain it, it is sufficient to observe that the plaintiffs and the other heirs of the deceased were minors at his death ; and the evidence does not inform us at what time they came of age. It appears that some of them are still minors.

The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 La. Ann. 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fridge-v-buhler-la-1851.