Home/U.S. Customs Court/Friden, Inc. v. United States

Friden, Inc. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 986, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2926
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 4, 1968
DocketNo. P68/5; protests 64/18834, etc. (San Francisco); No. P68/6; protests 64/18836, etc. (San Francisco)
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 986 (Friden, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Friden, Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 986, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2926 (cusc 1968).

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of adding machine parts, which are manufactures of the United States, exported without drawback, and returned without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means and that the applicable customs regulations have been complied with, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al. v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bertrand Freres, Inc. v. United States
47 Cust. Ct. 155 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Cust. Ct. 986, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friden-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1968.