Friden, Inc. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 986, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2926
United States Customs Court·Decided January 4, 1968·No. No. P68/5; protests 64/18834, etc. (San Francisco); No. P68/6; protests 64/18836, etc. (San Francisco)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of adding machine parts, which are manufactures of the United States, exported without drawback, and returned without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means and that the applicable customs regulations have been complied with, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al. v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friden, Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 986, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2926 (cusc 1968).
60 Cust. Ct. 986 (Friden, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bertrand Freres, Inc. v. United States
47 Cust. Ct. 155 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)