Fricks v. State
This text of 270 S.E.2d 35 (Fricks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals on the general grounds her conviction of burglary.
In view of the testimony of defendant’s purported accomplice, implicating defendant in the commission of the crime (though contradicted by the defendant), coupled with defendant’s presence near the scene of the crime (waiting in the driver’s seat of an automobile near the burglarized premises), we find that a rational trier of fact could reasonably have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560). See also Dent v. State, 149 Ga. App. 33 (253 SE2d 431).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 S.E.2d 35, 154 Ga. App. 738, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fricks-v-state-gactapp-1980.