Fricker v. New York City Off Track Betting Corp.
This text of 213 A.D.2d 590 (Fricker v. New York City Off Track Betting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated July 19, 1993, which, upon a jury verdict finding that the negligence of the defendant New York City Off Track Betting Corporation [591]*591was not the proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries, is in favor of the defendant New York City Off Track Betting Corporation and against him.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the record reveals that the court’s charge, as a whole, sufficiently instructed the jury about the law of proximate cause and the factual issues to be resolved (see, Scandell v Salerno, 155 AD2d 523; Bartlett v General Elec. Co., 90 AD2d 183).
We have examined the plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 A.D.2d 590, 624 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fricker-v-new-york-city-off-track-betting-corp-nyappdiv-1995.