Fricke v. Fricke
This text of 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 203 (Fricke v. Fricke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The jurisdiction of the common pleas court, in the matter of the •custody of children, is continuing, and the court is in no way bound by an agreement between the parties, and its decree is not affected thereby. Nor does the pendency of a petition for modification of an allowance ■of alimony operate to vacate the original decree. There was, therefore, .nothing to prevent the issuing of an attachment for contempt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fricke-v-fricke-ohcircthamilton-1899.