Fricke v. Fricke

Hamilton Circuit Court

Fricke v. Fricke

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 203

Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided January 15, 1899·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The jurisdiction of the common pleas court, in the matter of the •custody of children, is continuing, and the court is in no way bound by an agreement between the parties, and its decree is not affected thereby. Nor does the pendency of a petition for modification of an allowance ■of alimony operate to vacate the original decree. There was, therefore, .nothing to prevent the issuing of an attachment for contempt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The jurisdiction of the common pleas court, in the matter of the •custody of children, is continuing, and the court is in no way bound by an agreement between the parties, and its decree is not affected thereby. Nor does the pendency of a petition for modification of an allowance ■of alimony operate to vacate the original decree. There was, therefore, .nothing to prevent the issuing of an attachment for contempt.

Fricke v. Fricke, 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 203 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 203 (Fricke v. Fricke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.