Frick v. State
This text of 510 So. 2d 1077 (Frick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Scott FRICK, a/K/a Scott David Frick, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and W.H. Pasch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
EN BANC
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the instant case, the court has determined to recede from the decision in Meadows v. State, 498 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), and to follow its decision in Lee v. State, 491 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed.
DANAHY, C.J., and SCHEB, RYDER, CAMPBELL, SCHOONOVER, LEHAN, FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
510 So. 2d 1077, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frick-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.