Frick v. Nuthall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frick v. Nuthall

10 A.D.2d 905, 200 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10434

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 905 (Frick v. Nuthall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frick v. Nuthall, 10 A.D.2d 905, 200 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10434 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: There was no proof of the cause of action alleged in the complaint, which was based upon the theory that the plaintiff had signed the deeds in question upon the fraudulent representation that they were releases. (Appeal from a judgment of Erie Supreme Court dismissing the complaint in an action to set aside deeds to realty.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: There was no proof of the cause of action alleged in the complaint, which was based upon the theory that the plaintiff had signed the deeds in question upon the fraudulent representation that they were releases. (Appeal from a judgment of Erie Supreme Court dismissing the complaint in an action to set aside deeds to realty.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 905, 200 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frick-v-nuthall-nyappdiv-1960.