Frick v. Nevada Industrial Commission

Nevada Supreme Court

Frick v. Nevada Industrial Commission

592 P.2d 948, 95 Nev. 263, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 583

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedApril 6, 1979

DocketNo. 10408

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 592 P.2d 948 (Frick v. Nevada Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frick v. Nevada Industrial Commission, 592 P.2d 948, 95 Nev. 263, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 583 (Neb. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Erna Frick was injured on the job on August 18, 1970. She earned $747.45 per month. The Commission declared her to be permanently and totally disabled on October 1, 1974, and has paid her permanent total disability benefits since that date.

NRS 616.625 fixes benefits as of the date of injury. On that date NRS 616.580 provided that in cases of permanent total disability, compensation shall be 65 percent of the average monthly wage and that any excess of wages over $320 per month shall not be taken into account in computing such compensation. The Commission has paid her $208.80 per month, that is, 65 percent of $320 per month, pursuant to NRS 616.580 as it existed on the date of injury. She receives an additional $41.60 per month under NRS 616.626.

Contrary to appellant’s contention, the current version of NRS 616.580 does not apply. In the absence of a legislative intent to give an amendment retroactive effect, a compensation act increasing benefits is not retroactive. Virden v. Smith, 46 Nev. 208, 210 P. 129 (1922). There is no suggestion of retro-activity in the statute we are dealing with.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Erna Frick was injured on the job on August 18, 1970. She earned $747.45 per month. The Commission declared her to be permanently and totally disabled on October 1, 1974, and has paid her permanent total disability benefits since that date.

NRS 616.625 fixes benefits as of the date of injury. On that date NRS 616.580 provided that in cases of permanent total disability, compensation shall be 65 percent of the average monthly wage and that any excess of wages over $320 per month shall not be taken into account in computing such compensation. The Commission has paid her $208.80 per month, that is, 65 percent of $320 per month, pursuant to NRS 616.580 as it existed on the date of injury. She receives an additional $41.60 per month under NRS 616.626.

Contrary to appellant’s contention, the current version of NRS 616.580 does not apply. In the absence of a legislative intent to give an amendment retroactive effect, a compensation act increasing benefits is not retroactive. Virden v. Smith, 46 Nev. 208, 210 P. 129 (1922). There is no suggestion of retro-activity in the statute we are dealing with.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 P.2d 948, 95 Nev. 263, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frick-v-nevada-industrial-commission-nev-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack