Frick v. Hefti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frick v. Hefti

254 A.D.2d 153, 679 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10999

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D.2d 153 (Frick v. Hefti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frick v. Hefti, 254 A.D.2d 153, 679 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), [154]*154Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered February 23, 1998, which granted plaintiffs a judgment of ejectment, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The appeals from the orders, same court and Justice, entered December 12, 1997 and February 4, 1998, respectively, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The record reveals that the court properly granted plaintiffs a judgment of ejectment after both parties had sufficient opportunity to present their claims prior to trial. Furthermore, the court did not err in dismissing defendant’s counterclaims as they were without merit. Defendant’s appeal from the order entered on February 4, 1998 was dismissed by this Court by order entered August 20, 1998 (M-4364) and we therefore do not address her claims relating thereto. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), [154]*154Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered February 23, 1998, which granted plaintiffs a judgment of ejectment, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The appeals from the orders, same court and Justice, entered December 12, 1997 and February 4, 1998, respectively, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The record reveals that the court properly granted plaintiffs a judgment of ejectment after both parties had sufficient opportunity to present their claims prior to trial. Furthermore, the court did not err in dismissing defendant’s counterclaims as they were without merit. Defendant’s appeal from the order entered on February 4, 1998 was dismissed by this Court by order entered August 20, 1998 (M-4364) and we therefore do not address her claims relating thereto. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D.2d 153, 679 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frick-v-hefti-nyappdiv-1998.