Frick v. Burnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frick v. Burnett

158 A.D. 953, 143 N.Y.S. 1118, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 158 A.D. 953 (Frick v. Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frick v. Burnett, 158 A.D. 953, 143 N.Y.S. 1118, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon questions of law and fact, and judgment directed in favor of the defendants dismissing the complaint, with costs, including costs of this appeal. Held, that the motion for the dismissal of the complaint should have been granted. The finding that the plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant’s testator to board and care for him, as found by the referee, is disapproved, and this court finds and decides that the evidence is insufficient to warrant any such finding, or that there is anything due or unpaid under any contract, express or implied, for the board of defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed upon questions of law and fact, and judgment directed in favor of the defendants dismissing the complaint, with costs, including costs of this appeal. Held, that the motion for the dismissal of the complaint should have been granted. The finding that the plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant’s testator to board and care for him, as found by the referee, is disapproved, and this court finds and decides that the evidence is insufficient to warrant any such finding, or that there is anything due or unpaid under any contract, express or implied, for the board of defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 A.D. 953, 143 N.Y.S. 1118, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frick-v-burnett-nyappdiv-1913.