Frick v. Bahou
This text of 437 N.E.2d 277 (Frick v. Bahou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, without costs, and judgment of Special Term reinstated. Respondents’ grading of the examination was in contravention of the respondent commission’s own rules and regulations (4 NYCRR 66.1). The rules of an administrative agency, duly promulgated, are binding upon the agency as well as upon any other person who might be affected (see People ex rel. Doscher v Sisson, 222 NY 387, 393-394).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 N.E.2d 277, 56 N.Y.2d 777, 452 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frick-v-bahou-ny-1982.