Frick Co. v. McElwaney

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Frick Co. v. McElwaney

158 S.E. 374, 43 Ga. App. 209, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 255

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 14, 1931

Docket21225

StatusPublished

This text of 158 S.E. 374 (Frick Co. v. McElwaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frick Co. v. McElwaney, 158 S.E. 374, 43 Ga. App. 209, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 255 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyles, 0. J.

1. The bill of exceptions was filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court on December 22, 1930, and was transmitted, together with a transcript of the record, to the clerk of this court on January 12, 1931. The clerk of the trial court certified that on account of the press of other business he was unable to prepare and transmit a transcript of the record within the time prescribed by law. Under the foregoing facts the motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied.

2. The two special grounds of the motion for a new trial are not complete and understandable within themselves, and, therefore, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, they can not be considered.

[210]*210Decided April 14, 1931. W. B. Hollingsworth, A. A. Marshall, for plaintiff. J. W. Culpepper, for defendant.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge and no error of law appearing, this coprt is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI