Fricano v. Georgeades

147 A.D.2d 940
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1989·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Preliminary injunctive relief is a drastic remedy and will not be granted "unless a clear right thereto is established under the law and the undisputed facts upon the moving papers, and the burden of showing such an undisputed right rests upon the movant” (First Natl. Bank v Highland Hardwoods, 98 AD2d 924, 926).

The conclusory statements proffered by defendant in support of his application lack factual evidentiary detail and do not demonstrate that irreparable harm will result absent injunctive relief. Thus, Special Term abused its discretion in granting the injunction (see, A. John Merola, M.D., P. C. v Telonis, 127 AD2d 1007). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J. — preliminary injunction.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fricano v. Georgeades, 147 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

147 A.D.2d 940 (Fricano v. Georgeades) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank v. Highland Hardwoods, Inc.
98 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
A. John Merola, M.D., P. C. v. Telonis
127 A.D.2d 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)