Frias v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California·Decided July 11, 2023·No. 3:22-cv-00675·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 JOSEPH FRIAS, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG

12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) GRANTING IN PART JOINT 14 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., MOTION TO AMEND THE 15 Defendants. SCHEDULING ORDER, and

16 (2) ISSUING FIRST AMENDED

18 [ECF No. 44] 19 20 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to amend the scheduling order. ECF 21 No. 44. The parties represent to the Court that they have diligently propounded written 22 discovery and have taken multiple depositions in this matter. Id. at 3. After reviewing video 23 footage and thousands of pages of document production, Plaintiff amended his complaint 24 to name individual deputy defendants. ECF No. 44-1 at 3; see ECF No. 42. Plaintiff intends 25 to depose the recently-added named defendants and other medical providers; however, 26 Plaintiff’s counsel has an upcoming two-week trial, with extensive preparation needed, as 27 well as depositions scheduled in another case. ECF No. 44 at 3. Thus, the parties request a 28 three-month continuance of all scheduling order deadlines. Id. at 4–5. The Court 1 appreciates the parties’ thorough motion and concludes that the parties have demonstrated 2 the diligence necessary for a finding of good cause. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, 3 Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (“the focus of the [good cause] inquiry is upon the 4 moving party’s reasons for seeking modification. . . . If that party was not diligent, the 5 inquiry should end.”); Merck v. Swift Transp. Co., No. CV-16-01103-PHX-ROS, 2018 WL 6 4492362, at *2 (D. Ariz. Sept. 19, 2018) (“a party demonstrates good cause by acting 7 diligently to meet the original deadlines set forth by the court”). Thus, the Court GRANTS1 8 the joint motion and issues the following First Amended Scheduling Order: 9 1. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties by November 16, 2023. 10 “Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil 11 Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of 12 time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking 13 into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of 14 Civil Procedure. Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with 15 regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). A failure to 16 comply in this regard will result in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent an 17 order of the court, no stipulation continuing or altering this requirement will be 18 recognized by the court. The Court expects counsel to make every effort to resolve all 19 disputes without court intervention through the meet and confer process. If the parties 20 reach an impasse on any discovery issue, the movant must e-mail chambers at 21 efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov no later than 45 days after the date of service of the 22 written discovery response that is in dispute, seeking a telephonic conference with the 23 Court to discuss the discovery dispute. The email must include: (1) at least three proposed 24 times mutually agreed upon by the parties for the telephonic conference; (2) a neutral 25

26 1 The parties’ proposed pretrial conference date was unavailable on the Court’s calendar, 27 and the parties’ proposed mandatory settlement conference date was on a federal holiday. Thus, the instant amended scheduling order is slightly different from the schedule 28 1 statement of the dispute; and (3) one sentence describing (not arguing) each parties’ 2 position. The movant must copy opposing counsel on the email. No discovery motion may 3 be filed until the Court has conducted its pre-motion telephonic conference, unless the 4 movant has obtained leave of Court. All parties are ordered to read and to fully comply 5 with the Chambers Rules of Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. 6 2. The parties shall designate their respective experts in writing by 7 December 15, 2023. The parties must identify any person who may be used at trial to 8 present evidence pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Fed. R. Evid. This requirement 9 is not limited to retained experts. The date for exchange of rebuttal experts shall be by 10 January 16, 2024. The written designations shall include the name, address and telephone 11 number of the expert and a reasonable summary of the testimony the expert is expected to 12 provide. The list shall also include the normal rates the expert charges for deposition and 13 trial testimony. 14 3. By December 15, 2023, each party shall comply with the disclosure 15 provisions in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This 16 disclosure requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide 17 expert testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving 18 of expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails 19 to make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to 20 use evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In 21 addition, the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c). 22 4. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal 23 evidence under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D) by January 16, 2024. 24 5. All expert discovery shall be completed by all parties by February 16, 2024. 25 The parties shall comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph governing 26 fact discovery. Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court 27 may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on 28 the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence. 1 6. All other pretrial motions must be filed by April 12, 2024. Counsel for the 2 moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will 3 hear the motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion date and the 4 hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. Failure 5 to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. 6 Motions in limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as otherwise set by the 7 district judge. 8 7. A Mandatory Settlement Conference shall be conducted on June 21, 2024 at 9 9:30 a.m. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. Defendant must 10 serve on Plaintiff a written settlement proposal, which must include a specific demand 11 amount, no later than May 31, 2024. The plaintiff must respond to the plaintiff in writing 12 with a specific offer amount prior to the Meet and Confer discussion. The parties should 13 not file or otherwise copy the Court on these exchanges. Rather, the parties must include 14 their written settlement proposals in their respective Settlement Conference Statements to 15 the Court. Counsel for the parties must meet and confer in person or by phone no later 16 than June 7, 2024. Each party must prepare a Settlement Conference Statement, which will 17 be served on opposing counsel and lodged with the Court no later than June 13, 2024. The 18 Statement must be lodged in .pdf format via email to efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov 19 (not filed).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frias v. County of San Diego, (S.D. Cal. 2023).

Frias v. County of San Diego (Frias v. County of San Diego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related