Frias, Phillip
This text of Frias, Phillip (Frias, Phillip) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,500-01
EX PARTE PHILLIP ANDREW FRIAS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 20130D03266-171-1 IN THE 171ST DISTRICT COURT FROM EL PASO COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual assault and one count of
aggravated kidnaping. He was sentenced to life imprisonment on each count. Applicant filed a
motion for new trial, which was granted by the trial court on the basis of ineffective assistance of
counsel. The Eighth Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and reinstated his convictions. State
v. Frias, 511 S.W.3d 797 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2016). Applicant filed this application for a writ of
habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective. The trial court has signed findings
of fact recommending that this Court grant relief. We do not agree with the trial court. 2
Applicant has not met his burden to show that he is entitled to habeas relief. He does not
show that counsel’s performance was deficient or that he was prejudiced given the entirety of the
record and the totality of the evidence against him. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).
Based on this Court’s independent review of the entire record, we deny relief.
Filed: March 2, 2022 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frias, Phillip, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frias-phillip-texcrimapp-2022.