Frias, Phillip

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 2, 2022·No. WR-93,500-01·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,500-01

EX PARTE PHILLIP ANDREW FRIAS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 20130D03266-171-1 IN THE 171ST DISTRICT COURT FROM EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual assault and one count of

aggravated kidnaping. He was sentenced to life imprisonment on each count. Applicant filed a

motion for new trial, which was granted by the trial court on the basis of ineffective assistance of

counsel. The Eighth Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and reinstated his convictions. State

v. Frias, 511 S.W.3d 797 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2016). Applicant filed this application for a writ of

habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX .

CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective. The trial court has signed findings

of fact recommending that this Court grant relief. We do not agree with the trial court. 2

Applicant has not met his burden to show that he is entitled to habeas relief. He does not

show that counsel’s performance was deficient or that he was prejudiced given the entirety of the

record and the totality of the evidence against him. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).

Based on this Court’s independent review of the entire record, we deny relief.

Filed: March 2, 2022 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frias, Phillip, (Tex. 2022).

Frias, Phillip (Frias, Phillip) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Phillip Andrew Frias
511 S.W.3d 797 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016)