Friar v. State
This text of 801 P.2d 138 (Friar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[776]*776MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this post-conviction case, the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the circuit court without opinion. Friar v. State of Oregon, 103 Or App 130, 796 P2d 401 (1990). After the petition for review was allowed, the state filed a response confessing error, stating,
“Consequently, the state agrees that this case should be remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings, in which further testimony need not be taken, but in which the court should reconsider its decision, in the light of petitioner’s testimony concerning her state of mind at the time of her entry of plea.”
Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court are reversed. This case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
801 P.2d 138, 310 Or. 774, 1990 Ore. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friar-v-state-or-1990.