Freyre v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Freyre v. Ward

161 A.D.2d 349, 555 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5284

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 A.D.2d 349 (Freyre v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freyre v. Ward, 161 A.D.2d 349, 555 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5284 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated September 26, 1988, which dismissed petitioner as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of Sup Ct, NY County, Beverly Cohen, J., entered Mar. 30, 1989) dismissed, without costs and disbursements.

There was substantial evidence to support the finding of misconduct since petitioner admitted that he lied while under oath at a judicial proceeding regarding a suppression hearing to determine the reasonableness of the arresting officer’s conduct, and knowingly filed a false statement with the Department to obtain a merit award based upon that arrest (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436). Neither is the penalty of dismissal so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness. (See, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Carro and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated September 26, 1988, which dismissed petitioner as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of Sup Ct, NY County, Beverly Cohen, J., entered Mar. 30, 1989) dismissed, without costs and disbursements.

There was substantial evidence to support the finding of misconduct since petitioner admitted that he lied while under oath at a judicial proceeding regarding a suppression hearing to determine the reasonableness of the arresting officer’s conduct, and knowingly filed a false statement with the Department to obtain a merit award based upon that arrest (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436). Neither is the penalty of dismissal so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness. (See, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Carro and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 A.D.2d 349, 555 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freyre-v-ward-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack