Freyre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Freyre v. State

448 So. 2d 618, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12778

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 1984

DocketNo. 82-2178

StatusPublished

This text of 448 So. 2d 618 (Freyre v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freyre v. State, 448 So. 2d 618, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12778 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Victor Fabio Freyre appeals from a judgment and sentence for trafficking in cocaine.

Appellant raises four points on appeal. However, we need address only one because it is dispositive of the case. Appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We have carefully reviewed the record and found the evidence does not establish that appellant had either actual or constructive possession within the standards of Wale v. State, 397 So.2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) and Daudt v. State, 368 So.2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 376 So.2d 76 (Fla.1979).

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded with directions to discharge appellant.

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

DOWNEY and DELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI