Freymuth v. Woodrun Development Corp.

861 S.W.2d 203, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1482, 1993 WL 360949
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 1993·No. No. 62612·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Woodrun Development Corp., d/b/a Norco Development Company (builder) appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding Michael and Donna Freymuth (purchasers) $9,832.93 on their amended petition and awarding builder $3,146.44 on its counterclaim.

After a thorough review of the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we have determined that the judgment of the trial court is reviewable under Rule 73.01, is supported by substantial evidence, and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 73.01; Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). We also find that an opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freymuth v. Woodrun Development Corp., 861 S.W.2d 203, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1482, 1993 WL 360949 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

861 S.W.2d 203 (Freymuth v. Woodrun Development Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)