Freyer v. Van Maasdyk

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Freyer v. Van Maasdyk

94 N.Y.S. 1146

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.Y.S. 1146 (Freyer v. Van Maasdyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freyer v. Van Maasdyk, 94 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence of the services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant and of the value of those services is of the very slightest nature, and does n,ot warrant the judgment. Plaintiff is not entitled to receive compensation for what he did in the matter of the Nadison Manufacturing Company. He was the attorney for that company according to his own statement, and all that he appears to have done was to tell his client that it should pay its debts. Moreover, the weight of evidence is in favor of the defendant’s contention that the plaintiff has been paid in full. Judgment is reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The evidence of the services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant and of the value of those services is of the very slightest nature, and does n,ot warrant the judgment. Plaintiff is not entitled to receive compensation for what he did in the matter of the Nadison Manufacturing Company. He was the attorney for that company according to his own statement, and all that he appears to have done was to tell his client that it should pay its debts. Moreover, the weight of evidence is in favor of the defendant’s contention that the plaintiff has been paid in full. Judgment is reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freyer-v-van-maasdyk-nyappterm-1905.