Freybler v. Lucas

Michigan Court of Appeals

Freybler v. Lucas

197 N.W.2d 284, 39 Mich. App. 78, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1399

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 29, 1972

DocketDocket No. 11234

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 197 N.W.2d 284 (Freybler v. Lucas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freybler v. Lucas, 197 N.W.2d 284, 39 Mich. App. 78, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1399 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff filed her complaint to obtain reformation of a mortgage from defendants to plaintiff and her deceased father. The basis for relief was the mistake of the scrivener in failing to designate the mortgagees, plaintiff and her father, as joint tenants with right of survivorship. The answer of defendants, filed in propria persona, consisted of general denials. The trial court denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(2) and (3). On leave granted, plaintiff appeals.

The record demonstrates compliance with GCR 1963, 117.2 and establishes the mistake relied on. General denials in defendants’ answer did not controvert the proof of mistake, Doornbos v Nordman, 26 Mich App 278 (1970). Mistake of the scrivener is ground for reformation, Newland v Baptist Church Society of Bellevue, 137 Mich 335 (1904).

Reversed and remanded for entry of summary judgment for plaintiff. Plaintiff may recover her costs in both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff filed her complaint to obtain reformation of a mortgage from defendants to plaintiff and her deceased father. The basis for relief was the mistake of the scrivener in failing to designate the mortgagees, plaintiff and her father, as joint tenants with right of survivorship. The answer of defendants, filed in propria persona, consisted of general denials. The trial court denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(2) and (3). On leave granted, plaintiff appeals.

The record demonstrates compliance with GCR 1963, 117.2 and establishes the mistake relied on. General denials in defendants’ answer did not controvert the proof of mistake, Doornbos v Nordman, 26 Mich App 278 (1970). Mistake of the scrivener is ground for reformation, Newland v Baptist Church Society of Bellevue, 137 Mich 335 (1904).

Reversed and remanded for entry of summary judgment for plaintiff. Plaintiff may recover her costs in both courts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 N.W.2d 284, 39 Mich. App. 78, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freybler-v-lucas-michctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack