Freya Ferrell v. Michael J. Astrue

371 F. App'x 710
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 12, 2010
Docket09-2949
StatusUnpublished

This text of 371 F. App'x 710 (Freya Ferrell v. Michael J. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freya Ferrell v. Michael J. Astrue, 371 F. App'x 710 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Freya Ferrell, on behalf of her minor son D.W.C., appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income. Following careful de novo review, we conclude that the Commissioner’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, see Moore ex rel. Moore v. Barnhart, 413 F.3d 718, 721 (8th Cir.2005), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 F. App'x 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freya-ferrell-v-michael-j-astrue-ca8-2010.