Freya Anjelin Murray v. My Good Samaritan
This text of Freya Anjelin Murray v. My Good Samaritan (Freya Anjelin Murray v. My Good Samaritan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00608-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
FREYA ANJELIN MURRAY, Appellant,
v.
MY GOOD SAMARITAN, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 of McLennan County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Silva and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña
On December 5, 2022, appellant filed a notice of appeal. 2 On January 19, 2023,
the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that her notice of appeal was not in compliance
1 Appellant’s name varies throughout the record between “Angelin” and “Anjelin;” therefore, the
style reflects the spelling found on documents filed directly by appellant. 2 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. with the Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). Appellant was also advised that, if
the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of the letter, the appeal would
be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
Furthermore, on January 19, 2023, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that
she was delinquent in remitting a $205.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified
appellant the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days
from the date of the notice. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).
Appellant has not cured the defective notice of appeal, paid the filing fee, nor
otherwise responded to the notices from the clerk requiring a response or other action
within the time specified; accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of
prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).
L. ARON PEÑA JR Justice
Delivered and filed on the 20th day of April, 2023
Because this is a transfer case, we apply the precedent of the Waco court of Appeals to the extent it differs from our own. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Freya Anjelin Murray v. My Good Samaritan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freya-anjelin-murray-v-my-good-samaritan-texapp-2023.