Frey v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Frey v. Thompson

97 S.E. 753, 23 Ga. App. 160, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 91

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 16, 1918·No. 9499·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The real issue in this case is as to the proper location of a land line. There was evidence pro and eon, the jury found in favor of the defendant, there was evidence to authorize this finding, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. Osteen v. Wynn, 131 Qa. 209 (02 S. E. 37, 127 Am. St. R. 212).

2. The charge of the court, when considered as a whole, was full, fair, and not subject to the criticisms offered. The court did not, for any - of the reasons assigned, err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., mid Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. The real issue in this case is as to the proper location of a land line. There was evidence pro and eon, the jury found in favor of the defendant, there was evidence to authorize this finding, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. Osteen v. Wynn, 131 Qa. 209 (02 S. E. 37, 127 Am. St. R. 212).

2. The charge of the court, when considered as a whole, was full, fair, and not subject to the criticisms offered. The court did not, for any - of the reasons assigned, err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., mid Jenkins, J., concur.

Frey v. Thompson, 97 S.E. 753, 23 Ga. App. 160, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 91 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

97 S.E. 753 (Frey v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related