Frey v. Parsons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frey v. Parsons

291 A.D.2d 837, 737 N.Y.S.2d 314, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 999

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 1, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 A.D.2d 837 (Frey v. Parsons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frey v. Parsons, 291 A.D.2d 837, 737 N.Y.S.2d 314, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Ma-honey, J.), entered July 21, 2000, which ordered the disclosure of certain documents.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendants Western New York Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, Reverend Bishop Hae-Jong Kim and Reverend Dr. John F. Beeson abandoned their appeal from the May 26, 1998 interlocutory order addressing the issues raised on this appeal from a subsequent order and thus this appeal must be dismissed (see, Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 93 NY2d 750, 754-755; see also, [838]*838CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present — Green, J.P., Hayes, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Ma-honey, J.), entered July 21, 2000, which ordered the disclosure of certain documents.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendants Western New York Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, Reverend Bishop Hae-Jong Kim and Reverend Dr. John F. Beeson abandoned their appeal from the May 26, 1998 interlocutory order addressing the issues raised on this appeal from a subsequent order and thus this appeal must be dismissed (see, Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 93 NY2d 750, 754-755; see also, [838]*838CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present — Green, J.P., Hayes, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 837, 737 N.Y.S.2d 314, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frey-v-parsons-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack