Frey v. DeCordova Bend Estates Owners Ass'n

647 S.W.2d 246, 26 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 263, 1983 Tex. LEXIS 262
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 9, 1983
DocketC-1380
StatusPublished
Cited by108 cases

This text of 647 S.W.2d 246 (Frey v. DeCordova Bend Estates Owners Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frey v. DeCordova Bend Estates Owners Ass'n, 647 S.W.2d 246, 26 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 263, 1983 Tex. LEXIS 262 (Tex. 1983).

Opinion

WALLACE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Eugene C. Frey (Frey) filed suit for an injunction against DeCordova Bend Estates Owners Association (Association). Frey sought to enjoin the Association’s pos *247 sible assessment and collection of certain special fees from owners of property within the subdivision. These fees were $800 for a permit to build a house, $100 to transfer ownership of a lot, and $100 to lease a lot. The covenants provide that any unpaid fees will become a lien upon the lot in question and further give the Association the right to foreclose upon that lien in the event of nonpayment. Frey is currently under no obligation to pay any such fees. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court denied Frey’s motion and granted the motion of the Association. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 632 S.W.2d 877. We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

The issues presented are: (1) whether the assessments complained of are authorized by the restrictions and covenants of record which became a part of each landowner’s deed at the time of purchase; and (2) if such assessments are unauthorized, has Frey demonstrated the existence of an actual irreparable injury, not remediable at law, that would entitle him to permanent injunctive relief? The pertinent sections of the covenants (Sections 15, 16 and 19) and by-laws (Sections 3 and 4) are reproduced in full below. 1 Frey contends that the only *248 permissible assessments other than user fees, are those levied on all property owners equally. He further contends that the building, transfer and leasing fees are not levied on all property owners and are thus not permitted. We agree with that contention.

A study of the covenants and bylaws of the Association leads us to interpret the terms of the agreements as providing: that all property owners were also Association members; that the Association was to take title to the common property and recreational facilities in trust for all of its members; that the Association was to maintain and operate the common properties and recreational facilities, to charge user fees when appropriate and to levy only those monthly assessments sufficient to defray the actual costs of maintaining and operating its facilities and to adjust those fees annually as becomes necessary. It is evident the covenants and bylaws require these charges to be levied evenly upon all users and that the assessments were to be equally imposed upon all property owners.

The Association contends that Frey has not built upon, sold or leased his lot; therefore he has failed to make the requisite proof of the existence of an actual irreparable injury which is necessary to support the granting of injunctive relief. The record reflects no attempt or even intent by Frey to build upon, sell or lease his lot; nor is there a showing that the Association intends to assess a fee against Frey. Absent such proof, he is not entitled to injunctive relief. Luccous v. J.C. Kinley Co., 376 S.W.2d 336, 341 (Tex.1964). Moreover, fear or apprehension of the possibility of injury alone is not a basis for injunctive relief. Schulman v. City of Houston, 406 S.W.2d 219, 225 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1966, writ ref’d n.r.e.).

The mere invalidity of the contested fees does not constitute a substantial and actual injury or threat of imminent harm to Frey; therefore, he did not show that he was entitled to injunctive relief. Since Frey has sought only injunctive relief in this case, the trial court was correct in granting summary judgment for the Association.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

BARROW and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur in the result.
1

. Covenants:

15. Upon acceptance of an application for membership in DeCordova Bend Estates Owners Association, Inc. and the simultaneous execution of a sales contract or the acceptance of a Deed, each purchaser shall become a member of DeCordova Bend Estates Owners Association, Inc. (herein referred to as “The Association”), a non-profit corporation organized for the purpose of providing the members with clubhouse and private recreation facilities and to establish and maintain parks, ways, lanes, golf course, marine facilities, security protection, and other services for the common benefit of its members, including purchasers of lots from Dedicator, its successors and assigns. Said membership shall be conditioned upon observance of the rules and regulations established by The Association for the benefit and general welfare of its members and for the official operation thereof. Said membership shall also be conditioned upon payment, when due, of such dues, fees, and charges as The Association shall find necessary for the maintenance of the club facilities and services, including but not limited to the maintenance of lanes, ways, parks, golf course, marine facilities and any other services and benefits which The Association may provide for the benefit of the lots, facilities, and members. 75 per cent of the voting stock of The Association shall be retained by Dedicator until such time as the voting rights shall be transferred to the membership at large, in accordance with the bylaws of The Association.
16. By the acceptance and retention of title to any lot in the DeCordova Bend Estates, Phase I, each Grantee, his heirs and assigns, who is or becomes a member of The Association does hereby covenant and agree that The Association, its successors and assigns, shall have a lien upon the subject lots or lots second only to liens for taxes and any duly-recorded mortgage to secure the payment of the aforementioned dues, fees, and charges, including court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in connection with the collection of the same, it being agreed and understood that this covenant and agreement shall be in addition to and shall not be affected by such contracts, security agreements, and applications as such Grantees, their heirs or assigns, may enter into with The Association.
19. Beginning January 1, 1970, each purchaser of a lot from Dedicator, its successors and assigns, shall be assessed the sum of $12.50 per month for the maintenance and operations of The Association’s services and facilities, and Dedicator shall pay all other sums incurred by The Association for the construction, development, and operation of its facilities and services. Such assessments shall continue until Dedicator has transferred the voting rights in the stock to the membership at large; thereafter, such assessment shall be determined by The Association in accordance with its bylaws, and neither Dedicator nor any corporation or other entity with substantially the same ownership and control as Dedicator shall ever be assessed by The Association for any unimproved lot owned by it or transferred to a corporation or other entity with substantially the same ownership and control.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Premcor Pipeline Co. v. Jim Wingate
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2024
Texas Equal Access Fund v. Ashley Maxwell
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2024
Van Der Linden v. Khan
535 S.W.3d 179 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2017)
Schmidt v. Richardson
420 S.W.3d 442 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014)
Elke Crump and Steven Michael Perry v. Margarete Frenk
404 S.W.3d 146 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)
ETAN INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Lehmann
308 S.W.3d 489 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Salazar
304 S.W.3d 896 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)
Yarto v. Gilliland
287 S.W.3d 83 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Juarez v. Texas Ass'n of Sporting Officials El Paso Chapter
172 S.W.3d 274 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
647 S.W.2d 246, 26 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 263, 1983 Tex. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frey-v-decordova-bend-estates-owners-assn-tex-1983.