Frey v. Circuit Judge
64 N.W. 1047, 1 McGrath 285
Opinion
To compel the discharge of relator who was tried and convicted under How. Stat., Sec. 9093, because respondent, who was out on bail, voluntarily left the court room after the case was submitted to the jury and was not present when the jury brought in the verdict.
Denied November 19, 1895.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frey v. Circuit Judge, 64 N.W. 1047, 1 McGrath 285 (Mich. 1895).
64 N.W. 1047 (Frey v. Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Gross
324 N.W.2d 557 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Swan
231 N.W.2d 651 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1975)
Hanley v. State
434 P.2d 440 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. McCrary
287 S.W.2d 785 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1956)
Hyslop v. State
68 N.W.2d 698 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1955)
Mulvey v. State
41 So. 2d 156 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)
State Ex Rel. Shetsky v. Utecht
36 N.W.2d 126 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1949)
State v. Hardung
297 P. 167 (Washington Supreme Court, 1931)
State v. Thompson
219 N.W. 218 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1928)
People v. Auerbach
141 N.W. 869 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1913)
State v. Gorman
129 N.W. 589 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1911)
State v. Waymire
97 P. 46 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1908)
State v. Way
93 P. 159 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1907)