Frey & Campbell, Inc. v. Hartnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frey & Campbell, Inc. v. Hartnett

139 A.D.2d 928, 527 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4188

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 A.D.2d 928 (Frey & Campbell, Inc. v. Hartnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frey & Campbell, Inc. v. Hartnett, 139 A.D.2d 928, 527 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4188 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent’s determination that petitioner willfully failed to pay prevailing wages and supplements to eight employees by classifying them as laborers and carpenters rather than as plumbers is supported by substantial evidence. Petitioner knew or should have known that the employees were performing plumbing work yet were classified and paid lower wages as laborers and carpenters. The term willful does not imply a criminal intent to defraud but requires only that petitioner acted knowingly, intentionally or deliberately (Matter of Cam-Ful Indus. [Roberts], 128 AD2d 1006, 1007, quoting Matter of Volvo [Ross] 83 AD2d 344, 346, affd 57 NY2d 116; see also, Matter of Green Is. Constr. Co. v Roberts, 139 AD2d 907; Matter of Hull-Hazard, Inc. v Roberts, 129 AD2d 348, 352). (Labor Law § 220 [8].) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent’s determination that petitioner willfully failed to pay prevailing wages and supplements to eight employees by classifying them as laborers and carpenters rather than as plumbers is supported by substantial evidence. Petitioner knew or should have known that the employees were performing plumbing work yet were classified and paid lower wages as laborers and carpenters. The term willful does not imply a criminal intent to defraud but requires only that petitioner acted knowingly, intentionally or deliberately (Matter of Cam-Ful Indus. [Roberts], 128 AD2d 1006, 1007, quoting Matter of Volvo [Ross] 83 AD2d 344, 346, affd 57 NY2d 116; see also, Matter of Green Is. Constr. Co. v Roberts, 139 AD2d 907; Matter of Hull-Hazard, Inc. v Roberts, 129 AD2d 348, 352). (Labor Law § 220 [8].) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.2d 928, 527 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frey-campbell-inc-v-hartnett-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack