Freundlich v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Freundlich v. State

636 So. 2d 590, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4590, 1994 WL 182731

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 13, 1994

DocketNo. 93-1804

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 636 So. 2d 590 (Freundlich v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freundlich v. State, 636 So. 2d 590, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4590, 1994 WL 182731 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court allowed two proffered hearsay statements of the child-victim to be used at Freundlich’s sexual battery trial, plus the child’s own testimony, there is no apparent reversible error demonstrated. Pardo v. State, 596 So.2d 665 (Fla.1992). Compliance with the requirements of section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes, was satisfactory in this case. See State v. Townsend, 635 So.2d 949 (Fla.1994).

AFFIRMED.

COBB, W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court allowed two proffered hearsay statements of the child-victim to be used at Freundlich’s sexual battery trial, plus the child’s own testimony, there is no apparent reversible error demonstrated. Pardo v. State, 596 So.2d 665 (Fla.1992). Compliance with the requirements of section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes, was satisfactory in this case. See State v. Townsend, 635 So.2d 949 (Fla.1994).

AFFIRMED.

COBB, W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

636 So. 2d 590, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4590, 1994 WL 182731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freundlich-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack