Freund v. State

571 So. 2d 116, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9571, 1990 WL 205514
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 1990·No. No. 90-2450·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing and without attaching portions of the record demonstrating the appellant is not entitled to relief.

We find no error by the trial court in rejecting appellant’s claim as to the composition of the grand' jury. See State v. Moreland, 564 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). However, we agree with appellant that the trial court erred in rejecting his claim as to his attorney’s conflict of interest without either attaching portions of the record refuting such claim or conducting an evidentiary hearing thereon.

Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

ANSTEAD, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freund v. State, 571 So. 2d 116, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9571, 1990 WL 205514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

571 So. 2d 116 (Freund v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Moreland
564 So. 2d 1164 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)