Freund v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Freund v. State

571 So. 2d 116, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9571, 1990 WL 205514

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 19, 1990

DocketNo. 90-2450

StatusPublished

This text of 571 So. 2d 116 (Freund v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freund v. State, 571 So. 2d 116, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9571, 1990 WL 205514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing and without attaching portions of the record demonstrating the appellant is not entitled to relief.

We find no error by the trial court in rejecting appellant’s claim as to the composition of the grand' jury. See State v. Moreland, 564 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). However, we agree with appellant that the trial court erred in rejecting his claim as to his attorney’s conflict of interest without either attaching portions of the record refuting such claim or conducting an evidentiary hearing thereon.

Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

ANSTEAD, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI