Freund v. State
506 So. 2d 437, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7274
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 1987·No. No. 4-86-0068·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
AFFIRMED.
ORDER
ORDERED that appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.
FURTHER ORDERED that the following question is certified to the Supreme Court of Florida as one of great public importance:
WHETHER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT’S HOLDING IN YOHN V. STATE, 476 S0.2D 123 (FLA.1985), IS VIOLATED WHEN, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE YOHN OPINION, A TRIAL COURT INSTRUCTS THE JURY WITH THE OLD STANDARD INSTRUCTION ON INSANITY AND ADDS WITHIN THE CHARGE THE SENTENCE, “THE STATE MUST PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS SANE."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freund v. State, 506 So. 2d 437, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7274 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
506 So. 2d 437 (Freund v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
John S. Freund v. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General
117 F.3d 1543 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
Freund v. State
520 So. 2d 556 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
State v. Hodges
506 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)