Freund v. State

506 So. 2d 437, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7274
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 18, 1987
DocketNo. 4-86-0068
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 506 So. 2d 437 (Freund v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freund v. State, 506 So. 2d 437, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7274 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

ORDER

ORDERED that appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.

FURTHER ORDERED that the following question is certified to the Supreme Court of Florida as one of great public importance:

WHETHER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT’S HOLDING IN YOHN V. STATE, 476 S0.2D 123 (FLA.1985), IS VIOLATED WHEN, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE YOHN OPINION, A TRIAL COURT INSTRUCTS THE JURY WITH THE OLD STANDARD INSTRUCTION ON INSANITY AND ADDS WITHIN THE CHARGE THE SENTENCE, “THE STATE MUST PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS SANE."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John S. Freund v. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General
117 F.3d 1543 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
Freund v. State
520 So. 2d 556 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
State v. Hodges
506 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 So. 2d 437, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freund-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.