Freund v. Hamilton Construction Co.
This text of 107 Cal. App. 54 (Freund v. Hamilton Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A motion by Martha Freund, a party to the above-entitled actions for an order dismissing the appeals of Hamilton Construction Company and John E. Hamilton and John E. Hamilton individually and doing business under the name and style of Hamilton Construction Company taken therein, upon the ground that said appeals have not been prosecuted with due diligence.
It appears there has been delay in the filing of the transcript on appeal in this court, but the record fails to show that the proceedings for a transcript in the court below have been terminated and the motion must for that reason be denied. (Rule 6, sec. 1, Rules of the Supreme Court; Crocker v. Crocker, 76 Cal. App. 606 [245 Pac. 438]; Smith v. Jaccard, 20 Cal. App. 280 [128 Pac. 1023, 1026].)
The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 Cal. App. 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freund-v-hamilton-construction-co-calctapp-1930.