Freuder v. Morgan Lithograph Co.

4 F. Supp. 742, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1329
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedSeptember 13, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 4 F. Supp. 742 (Freuder v. Morgan Lithograph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freuder v. Morgan Lithograph Co., 4 F. Supp. 742, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1329 (S.D.N.Y. 1933).

Opinion

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

This motion to set aside purported service of process, subpoena in an Equity Cause on defendant Morgan Lithograph Company is granted.

The statement in the affidavits of Vernon Chamley and E. S. Gaylor, Jr., submitted for the defendant which has appeared specially, to the effect that the Morgan Lithograph Company went into federal receivership in equity in Ohio, Northern district, on June 22, 1933, that Mr. Chamley was appointed receiver, and that when Gaylor was served with the subpoena herein on June 23, 1933, he was employed by the receiver and not by the company are not challenged, and it is hard to see how they could be successfully challenged. This renders any reference to ascertain facts unnecessary, for those facts thus established preclude any personal jurisdiction of the company herein, for the subpoena was not served on an agent thereof. Feder v. A. B. Fiedler & Sons et al. (C. C.) 116 F. 378, 379.

Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feder v. A. B. Fiedler & Sons
116 F. 378 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 F. Supp. 742, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freuder-v-morgan-lithograph-co-nysd-1933.