Home/City of New York Municipal Court/Freudenheim v. Raduziner

Freudenheim v. Raduziner

12 Misc. 654
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Freudenheim v. Raduziner. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Misc. 500 →
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided July 1, 1895·Published

Opinion

Oonlan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict by direction of the court and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed on former opinion of this court. See Freudenheim v. Raduziner, 10 Misc. Rep. 500; 81 N. Y. Supp. 194.

Fitzsimons and Newbubger, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freudenheim v. Raduziner, 12 Misc. 654 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

12 Misc. 654 (Freudenheim v. Raduziner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freudenheim v. Raduziner
10 Misc. 500 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1894)