Freudenberg v. Rainbow Luminous Products, Inc.
245 A.D. 725
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order denying defendants’ motion to require the county clerk of Kings county to receive and enter a judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Water Right & Electrical Co., Inc., v. Rockland Light & Power Co. [post, p. 739], decided herewith.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freudenberg v. Rainbow Luminous Products, Inc., 245 A.D. 725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
245 A.D. 725 (Freudenberg v. Rainbow Luminous Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Attolino v. Stow
285 A.D. 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)