Freudenberg v. Rainbow Luminous Products, Inc.
This text of 245 A.D. 725 (Freudenberg v. Rainbow Luminous Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying defendants’ motion to require the county clerk of Kings county to receive and enter a judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Water Right & Electrical Co., Inc., v. Rockland Light & Power Co. [post, p. 739], decided herewith.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D. 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freudenberg-v-rainbow-luminous-products-inc-nyappdiv-1935.