Freud v. Saginaw Circuit Judge
This text of 85 N.W. 193 (Freud v. Saginaw Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The writ must be denied on the ground that mandamus is not the proper remedy. Mardian v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 118 Mich. 353 (76 N. W. 497), and cases cited; St. Clair Tunnel Co. v. St. Clair Circuit Judge, 114 Mich. 417 (72 N. W. 249); City of Detroit v. Wayne Circuit Judge, ante, 634 (85 N. W. 1). See, also, the following unreported cases: Lee v. Wayne Circuit Judge, Schellenberg v. Wayne Circuit Judge, Township Board of St. Clair v. St. Clair Circuit Judge, and Eisenhardt v. Kent Circuit Judge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 N.W. 193, 125 Mich. 670, 1901 Mich. LEXIS 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freud-v-saginaw-circuit-judge-mich-1901.