Freud v. Saginaw Circuit Judge

85 N.W. 193, 125 Mich. 670, 1901 Mich. LEXIS 862
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 12, 1901·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ must be denied on the ground that mandamus is not the proper remedy. Mardian v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 118 Mich. 353 (76 N. W. 497), and cases cited; St. Clair Tunnel Co. v. St. Clair Circuit Judge, 114 Mich. 417 (72 N. W. 249); City of Detroit v. Wayne Circuit Judge, ante, 634 (85 N. W. 1). See, also, the following unreported cases: Lee v. Wayne Circuit Judge, Schellenberg v. Wayne Circuit Judge, Township Board of St. Clair v. St. Clair Circuit Judge, and Eisenhardt v. Kent Circuit Judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freud v. Saginaw Circuit Judge, 85 N.W. 193, 125 Mich. 670, 1901 Mich. LEXIS 862 (Mich. 1901).

85 N.W. 193 (Freud v. Saginaw Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hopper v. Livingston Probate Judge
100 N.W. 266 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1904)
Steel v. Clinton Circuit Judge
95 N.W. 993 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1903)