FREUD PROPHETE v. PAT FRANK, CLERK

District Court of Appeal of Florida

FREUD PROPHETE v. PAT FRANK, CLERK

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 2019

Docket17-3810

StatusPublished

This text of FREUD PROPHETE v. PAT FRANK, CLERK (FREUD PROPHETE v. PAT FRANK, CLERK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

FREUD PROPHETE v. PAT FRANK, CLERK, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

FREUD PROPHETE and KIWANA ) PROPHETE, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3810 ) PAT FRANK, as Clerk of the ) Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, ) Florida, ) ) Appellee. ) ) )

Opinion filed February 8, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Claudia R. Isom, Judge.

Arthur Barksdale, IV and Philip D. Storey, of Alvarez, Winthrop, Thompson & Storey, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.

David M. Caldevilla of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A., Tampa; Dale K. Bohner, General Counsel, Tampa; and Shelby K. Russ, Staff Attorney, Tampa, for Appellee Pat Frank, as Clerk of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

MORRIS and BLACK, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI