Fretwell v. State
This text of 503 So. 2d 1000 (Fretwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant's conviction but vacate his sentence and remand for a new sentencing hearing. We believe the trial court erred in assessing points against appellant with reference to his prior failure to appear for a hearing in traffic court, and also for assessing points for previous un-counseled convictions without determining whether counsel had been properly waived in those cases. See Pilla v. State, 477 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
503 So. 2d 1000, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 812, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fretwell-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.