Fretwell v. State
503 So. 2d 1000, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 812, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7254
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 1987·No. No. 85-2350·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant's conviction but vacate his sentence and remand for a new sentencing hearing. We believe the trial court erred in assessing points against appellant with reference to his prior failure to appear for a hearing in traffic court, and also for assessing points for previous un-counseled convictions without determining whether counsel had been properly waived in those cases. See Pilla v. State, 477 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fretwell v. State, 503 So. 2d 1000, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 812, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7254 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
503 So. 2d 1000 (Fretwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oldacre v. State
509 So. 2d 1343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)