Fretwell v. State

503 So. 2d 1000, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 812, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7254
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 18, 1987
DocketNo. 85-2350
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 503 So. 2d 1000 (Fretwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fretwell v. State, 503 So. 2d 1000, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 812, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7254 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's conviction but vacate his sentence and remand for a new sentencing hearing. We believe the trial court erred in assessing points against appellant with reference to his prior failure to appear for a hearing in traffic court, and also for assessing points for previous un-counseled convictions without determining whether counsel had been properly waived in those cases. See Pilla v. State, 477 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oldacre v. State
509 So. 2d 1343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 So. 2d 1000, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 812, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fretwell-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.