FRESSES v. New

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

FRESSES v. New

17 A.3d 920, 610 Pa. 6, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 904

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 15, 2011

Docket161 EM 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.3d 920 (FRESSES v. New) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

FRESSES v. New, 17 A.3d 920, 610 Pa. 6, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 904 (Pa. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2011, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and or Other Appropriate Relief’ and the “Application for Relief (Requirement of Lower Court to Honor Pa. Superior Court Order, Reassignment of this Legal Matter to Another Judge for Higher Court Compliance)” are DENIED, without prejudice to Petitioner to seeking similar relief in the Superior Court. Additionally, the Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2011, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and or Other Appropriate Relief’ and the “Application for Relief (Requirement of Lower Court to Honor Pa. Superior Court Order, Reassignment of this Legal Matter to Another Judge for Higher Court Compliance)” are DENIED, without prejudice to Petitioner to seeking similar relief in the Superior Court. Additionally, the Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.3d 920, 610 Pa. 6, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fresses-v-new-pa-2011.