Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. William Ede Co.

California Supreme Court

Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. William Ede Co.

152 Cal. 453

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 3, 1907

DocketS. F. No. 4376

StatusPublished

This text of 152 Cal. 453 (Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. William Ede Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. William Ede Co., 152 Cal. 453 (Cal. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This action is in all respects like the action of Fresno Canal and Irrigation Company, plaintiff and respondent, v. Marcus Hart et al., defendants and appellants, No. 4372, ante, p. 450, [92 Pac. 1010], this day decided. The defendant was the successor in interest to certain lands originally owned by Hart and affected by the water contracts in suit. • The cause has been submitted to follow the determination in the Hart case, and for the reasons there given the judgment and order are reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This action is in all respects like the action of Fresno Canal and Irrigation Company, plaintiff and respondent, v. Marcus Hart et al., defendants and appellants, No. 4372, ante, p. 450, [92 Pac. 1010], this day decided. The defendant was the successor in interest to certain lands originally owned by Hart and affected by the water contracts in suit. • The cause has been submitted to follow the determination in the Hart case, and for the reasons there given the judgment and order are reversed and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 Cal. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fresno-canal-irrigation-co-v-william-ede-co-cal-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack