Home/California Supreme Court/Fresno Canal Etc. Co. v. William Ede Co.

Fresno Canal Etc. Co. v. William Ede Co.

92 P. 1011, 152 Cal. 453, 1907 Cal. LEXIS 370
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 3, 1907
DocketS.F. No. 4376.
StatusPublished

This text of 92 P. 1011 (Fresno Canal Etc. Co. v. William Ede Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fresno Canal Etc. Co. v. William Ede Co., 92 P. 1011, 152 Cal. 453, 1907 Cal. LEXIS 370 (Cal. 1907).

Opinion

This action is in all respects like the action of Fresno Canaland Irrigation Company, plaintiff and respondent, v. Marcus Hartet al., defendants and appellants, No. 4372, ante, p. 450, [92 P. 1010], this day decided. The defendant was the successor in interest to certain lands originally owned by Hart and affected by the water contracts in suit. The cause has been submitted to follow the determination in the Hart case, and for the reasons there given the judgment and order are reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Hart
92 P. 1010 (California Supreme Court, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 P. 1011, 152 Cal. 453, 1907 Cal. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fresno-canal-etc-co-v-william-ede-co-cal-1907.