Freshour v. Kline

519 N.E.2d 646, 35 Ohio St. 3d 180, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 38
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 24, 1988
DocketNo. 87-464
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 519 N.E.2d 646 (Freshour v. Kline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freshour v. Kline, 519 N.E.2d 646, 35 Ohio St. 3d 180, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 38 (Ohio 1988).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant essentially requests that this court take jurisdiction of the instant matter and order Judge Ammer of the Court of Common Pleas of Pickaway County to act upon his request and motion.1 The record fails to show that there was a case filed or pending in the court of common pleas upon which the court of appeals could order Judge Ammer to proceed. Therefore, the court of appeals was correct in stating that appellant failed to state a ground upon which relief could be granted.

Even if this were not so, appellant has failed to sustain his burden of establishing that a writ of mandamus should issue by demonstrating that he has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for. State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141, 40 O.O. 2d 141, 228 N.E. 2d 631.

The judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 N.E.2d 646, 35 Ohio St. 3d 180, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freshour-v-kline-ohio-1988.