Fresco v. 157 East 72nd Street Condominium

816 N.E.2d 187, 3 N.Y.3d 630, 782 N.Y.S.2d 398, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1564
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 24, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 816 N.E.2d 187 (Fresco v. 157 East 72nd Street Condominium) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fresco v. 157 East 72nd Street Condominium, 816 N.E.2d 187, 3 N.Y.3d 630, 782 N.Y.S.2d 398, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1564 (N.Y. 2004).

Opinion

Motions for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Whitfield v City of New York, 90 NY2d 777).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitfield v. City of New York
689 N.E.2d 515 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
816 N.E.2d 187, 3 N.Y.3d 630, 782 N.Y.S.2d 398, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fresco-v-157-east-72nd-street-condominium-ny-2004.