Frericks v. Coster

9 F. Cas. 805, 1884 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2649
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJanuary 19, 1884
DocketCase No. 5,108a
StatusPublished

This text of 9 F. Cas. 805 (Frericks v. Coster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frericks v. Coster, 9 F. Cas. 805, 1884 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2649 (circtsdny 1884).

Opinion

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

The demurrer interposed by the defendant is not to the whole complaint or to any separate cause of action alleged in the complaint, and is, therefore, an unauthorized pleading. Code, § 492. The supplemental pleading of the plaintiff which is thus demurred to does not take the place of the original complaint; it avers facts arising since the original complaint which increase the plaintiff’s damages but do not change his cause of action. It is a pleading in addition to the original cbmplaint but not one in place of it, and is authorized by section 544 of the Code of Procedure. Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 F. Cas. 805, 1884 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frericks-v-coster-circtsdny-1884.