Frenger v. Katz
This text of 241 A.D. 766 (Frenger v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Nassau county reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate and set aside the deficiency judgment entered herein in the sum of $1,556.03 granted, with ten dollars costs. Section 1083-a of the Civil Practice Act imposes a limitation upon the entry of deficiency judgments after a sale during the emergency period, by providing that the residue of the debt shall not be the subject of a deficiency judgment if no motion therefor shall be made as in said section 1083-a prescribed. Failing to make such a motion, the proceeds of the sale satisfy the mortgage debt, and a deficiency judgment may not be entered. (Feiber Realty Corp. v. Abel, No. 1, 240 App. Div. 985.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frenger-v-katz-nyappdiv-1934.