Frenduta Et Ux. v. Yoscovitch Et Ux.

84 Pa. Super. 58, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 212
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 4, 1924
DocketAppeal, 4
StatusPublished

This text of 84 Pa. Super. 58 (Frenduta Et Ux. v. Yoscovitch Et Ux.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frenduta Et Ux. v. Yoscovitch Et Ux., 84 Pa. Super. 58, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 212 (Pa. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This appeal presents the same questions and involves a consideration of practically the same evidence discussed in the case of Foos v. Pogar, in which an opinion has this day been filed, and for the reasons there stated we are convinced that the court below did not abuse its discretion in refusing to open the judgment.

The order of the court below is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at cost of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 Pa. Super. 58, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frenduta-et-ux-v-yoscovitch-et-ux-pasuperct-1924.