Frenckiewich v. Dowd

291 Mass. 95
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 14, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 291 Mass. 95 (Frenckiewich v. Dowd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frenckiewich v. Dowd, 291 Mass. 95 (Mass. 1935).

Opinion

By the Court.

The petitioner, without conforming to the provisions of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 104, in regard to claiming a jury trial, seeks by this petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to grant his motion (which was denied) to remove an action to the Superior Court for trial by jury on the single ground that the denial of his motion violated the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. There is nothing in this contention. “The first ten amendments to the Federal Constitution contain no restrictions on the powers of the State, but were intended to operate solely on Federal Government.” Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172, 174. Commonwealth v. Wilkins, 243 Mass. 356, 361. Commonwealth v. Gedzium, 259 Mass. 453, 457. Gaines v. Washington, 277 U. S. 81, 85.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Publicover
98 N.E.2d 633 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1951)
Commonwealth v. DiStasio
8 N.E.2d 923 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
291 Mass. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frenckiewich-v-dowd-mass-1935.