Frenchman, Inc. v. Division of Administration, Department of Transportation

495 So. 2d 750, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 526, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2721
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 9, 1986·No. No. 67934·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This Court originally granted review in Division of Administration, Department of Transportation v. Frenchman, Inc., 476 So.2d 224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), because certain language in that opinion appeared to conflict with prior decisions concerning the quantification of severance damages in eminent domain proceedings. Upon further examination, however, we find the holding in Frenchman to be consistent with precedent. Therefore, because no conflict exists between Frenchman and any opinion from either another district court or this Court, we have no jurisdiction to review the case at bar. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frenchman, Inc. v. Division of Administration, Department of Transportation, 495 So. 2d 750, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 526, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2721 (Fla. 1986).

495 So. 2d 750 (Frenchman, Inc. v. Division of Administration, Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Partyka v. Florida Department of Transportation
606 So. 2d 495 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Religious of the Sacred Heart of Texas v. City of Houston
836 S.W.2d 606 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
Capo Investment Group Corp. v. State, Department of Transportation
578 So. 2d 513 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Farish v. South Florida Water Management District
515 So. 2d 369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)