French v. Wellman
This text of 413 So. 2d 143 (French v. Wellman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an interlocutory order granting a motion to set aside a default.
Appellees initially filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, arguing this court did not have jurisdiction, citing Yates v. Roller Skating Rinks, Inc., 379 So.2d 1333 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Based on appellants’ response, appellees conceded and withdrew the motion to dismiss. Appellees erred, not in filing their motion to dismiss, but in withdrawing it. In Yates, we held that an order granting1 a motion to set aside a default, as distinguished from an order setting aside a judgment entered on a default (sometimes called a default judgment),2 was a non-final order not reviewable by appeal or common law certiorari. Since Yates is indistinguishable from this appeal, this appeal is
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
413 So. 2d 143, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/french-v-wellman-fladistctapp-1982.