French v. Venable

2 D.C. 509

This text of 2 D.C. 509 (French v. Venable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
French v. Venable, 2 D.C. 509 (circtddc 1825).

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J.,' absent,)

refused to reinstate the cause, saying, that an appearance could not be- entered in the office; and the clerk was not bound, upon such a verbal order, [510]*510to make the entry in Court, at the adjourned session of the Court, although it was, 'in law, the same term. The Court has uniformly refused to reinstate such cases unless the omission to enter the appearance was by neglect 6f the clerk, and referred to lhe case of Williamson v. Bryan, at April term, 1823, [ante, 407,] and several other eases in this Court.

Mr. Key, for the plaintiff. Mr. Hall, for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 D.C. 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/french-v-venable-circtddc-1825.